Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Constantin, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Vander Zanden, B. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Parallelization of the Hoshen-Kopelman Algorithm Using a Finite State Machine

Jeffrey M. Constantin

DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE, UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE, KNOXVILLE, TN 37996-1301

Michael W. Berry

DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE, UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE, KNOXVILLE, TN 37996-1301

Bradley T. Vander Zanden

DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE, UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE, KNOXVILLE, TN 37996-1301

In applications such as landscape ecology, computer mod eling is used to assess habitat fragmentation and its ecological implications. Maps (two-dimensional grids) of habitat clusters or patches are analyzed to determine the number, location, and sizes of clusters. Recently, improved sequential and parallel implementations of the Hoshen- Kopelman cluster identification algorithm have been designed. These implementations use a finite state ma chine to reduce redundant integer comparisons during the cluster identification process. The sequential implementa tion for large maps performs cluster identification by par titioning the map along row boundaries and merging the results of the partitions. The parallel implementation on a 32-processor Thinking Machines CM-5 provides an effi cient mechanism for performing cluster identification in parallel. Although the sequential implementation achieved promising speed improvements ranging from 1.39 to 2.00 over an existing Hoshen-Kopelman implementation, the parallel implementation achieved a minimum speedup of 5.41 over the improved sequential implementation, exe cuted on a Sun SPARCstation 10.

International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, Vol. 11, No. 1, 34-48 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/109434209701100103
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?